|
critiques of photos that bloggers post of themselves. Posted 10/21/2003 07:45 AM by cmonks in > critiques. As any patriotic American is, I'm infatuated with blogs. I think blogs are easily the most important thing to happen to the media since "Newlyweds" starring Nick Lachey and Jessica Simpson. Blogs are changing the way people with enough money to own or have access to a computer receive their information about the world. In short, blogs are wicked awesome. I have many favorite blogs. Take a look at my blogroll and you'll see an assortment of happy, jolly bloggers who expand my knowledge horizons each and every day. And there are still even more blogs out there that I read every day who aren't listed, mainly because they think they're too cool to link me, but also because they are such busy and important bloggers they haven't the time to be decent for just one second and link to my site from theirs. Aside from the fresh off the presses-like information I attain from blogs, I also enjoy getting to know the personal, real life sides of bloggers. Some bloggers readily open up their real-life worlds to their readers, like telling what they had for dinner or who starred in their wet dream from the night before. Yet, the way I like to get to know just how my favorite bloggers are in real life is through the photos of themselves they include on their blogs. It's fascinating placing a face with the words that spew out of it. Not every blogger does it, but those who do are brave and courageous for displaying their mugs for all the blogosphere to see. It takes a lot of gumption to show the world what you look like. I know I never will (as you know from my famous treatise on the issue). So I think they deserve some mad props and just desserts. Thus to honor these brave and courageous bloggers I will begin a new feature on this site where I will critique the photos that bloggers post of themselves. I shall call this feature "My Critiques of Photos That Bloggers Post of Themselves." Before I kick off this new feature let me explain the grading system which I'll use for each blogger's photograph: A = Wow. Way to go. You got the goods and you know how to deliver them. There should be more photos of you on your blog; in fact it should be riddled with them. I shall dream about you. B = Solid effort. You're not quite as good-looking as me, but still you don't look troubled or ill. Your weird writings aside, you look to be a pretty normal person who if I passed on the street I might smile at, but in a very non-flirtatious way. Please don't misread my display of friendliness—I don't want to date you. C = Your photo looks like a rejected yearbook picture. You know, like you either had one eye closed or some saliva dangling from a tooth. This of course begs the question: if you didn't select this picture for your yearbook, why did you choose it for your blog? Then again beauty is in the eye of the beholder; who cares if your beholder is blind and retarded? D = Well, it could be worse: you could have lesions or pronounced moles on your face. Your bravery for posting the pic is commendable, if not philanthropic. If they made TV Movie of the Weeks about homely looking people willing to post their photos yours would be premiere during sweeps. F = No comment. I'm smiling and not saying anything because I was taught that's the polite thing to do when you're frightened by a grotesque monstrosity that makes you want to vomit all the way home to your momma. Alrighty then, on with my critiques...
GRADE: B-
GRADE: C
GRADE: C+
GRADE: B
GRADE: A- So that wraps up this first installment of "My Critiques of Photos That Bloggers Post of Themselves." You're welcome. If you know of a blogger who has a photo of themselves posted on their site and would like to see me critique it, let me know. Likewise, if you have a picture of yourself posted on your own blog and would like me to critique it, please send me an email and I'll see what I can do. No promises; I only critique blogger's pictures which enthrall and/or terrify me.
Comments. |